DECEMBER
18, 2003 -- These observations would discuss the present detention
of one Saddam Hussein,
had I snapped that photo of Saddam Hussein Iraqi Tyrant getting a post-spider
hole emergence physical. But I do not have photos to post here of Saddam
(was he ever read his Miranda rights; if they are not applicable can he refuse
to offer more than his name, rank and serial number?).
I do
have, however, a photo of a packed parking lot in a Waterbury, Connecticut
mall the day after a heavy snowfall. Also offered, here, is a photo
of a table in Ballrooms D/E of New York City's Grand Hyatt Hotel during the
lunch at
the opening day, December 8, of the four day UBS 31st annual media week conference. On the
third day of this gathering, Janet L. Robinson, a New York Times senior
vice president acknowledged that the U.S. economy "is improving".
Her assertion was certainly not refuted by the filled parking lot at
Brass Mill Commons in Waterbury, Connecticut, the day after a heavy
snowfall covered the northeast. Now, it did not take the Rush Limbaugh
influence
for me to wonder if the Bushphobes on the left would rather not hear
about good economic news, and I could not help but imagine that there
were offices in the Times community
that might have grumbled on learning of Ms. Robinson's remarks at the UBS conference.
Another
Timesperson's remarks to the assembled also had me considering its
rippling aspect.
|
A
table in Ballrooms D/E of New York City's Grand Hyatt Hotel
during
the lunch at the opening day of the UBS
31st Annual Media Week
Conference.
|
|
When
I heard Leonard P. Forman, another Times senior vice president,and
chief financial officer, say that employes and retirees were
paying a greater share of health costs, I wondered how this
might mesh with the editorial support at the Times for a greater
government role in health care. I
was left to conclude that the paper prefers a smaller role for
itself in employee health
care, to be assumed by the taxpayers
at large.
At
this point, the obligation of full disclosure requires that I
acknowledge that the photo of the table at the UBS luncheon was
taken contrary
to conference guidelines. The media was barred from taking video
or still pictures outside the press room which, the times I checked,
was always empty.
Although
I attended with press credentials, I am a Time Warner stockholder
and was therefore quite pleased to find that UBS in its research
report on Time Warner listed it as a Buy (all right, a Buy 2, if
not Buy 1).
Wayne
Pace, Time Warner executive vice president and chief financial
officer, gave the keynote presentation at the first day's luncheon
and by the time of his talk, I realized that this conference consisted
of annual reports - like statements to the assembled. This would
suggest that this media conference offers a tryout for the presentation
of our leading media companies at annual meetings of shareholders.
Mr. Pace indicated that Time Warner is doing fairly well, except
at its magazine division. (Perhaps Time might consider reducing
its newsstand price and cutting the large number of writers who
contribute to the major pieces, each issue.) The stock is still
down about
a third of the price of my first purchase, but I left Mr. Pace's presentation
hopeful that I will not be bankrupted out of my holding, as has afflicted
me at other companies.
After
that Monday's lunch (during which I was told not to take photos
and responded with an offer to pay for my lunch, an offer graciuously
declined), I heard Fox Filmed Entertainment Chairman Tom Rothman
advise his audience to focus on profitability, not on market
share.
|
|
The
Brass Mill Mall located in Waterbury, Connecticut, the day after
a heavy snowfall. |
|
This
was just after Mr. Pace had told us of Time Warner market share
in one area or another. Indeed, other companies
also mentioned market share, including The New York Times,
as I recall, and I guess, considering Mr. Rothman's advise,
if profits would be better, the emphasis would be on profits,
not on market share.
Most
of the presentations I heard included pledges of responsibility
to the shareholders and, still a novice in corporate matters,
I found myself wondering if stock prices might have been higher
in the past fiscal year if consideration had actually been given
to
shareholders, corporate responsibility-wise.
According
to a conference press release, top executives from 60 media companies
were to make presentations, to be received by some "1800
investors, reporters and analysts from around the world." And
Lonely Pamphleteer Review was one of them.
|
|
|