Saturday, December 15, 2018
A Federalist 57 Website
D. R. ZUKERMAN, proprietor

An "Existential Threat" To The Media?


June 5, 2018 --

"There's an existential threat to the presidency.", declared NBC's " Meet the Press" moderator Chuck Todd, on the May 27 program. Was he talking about a threat from outside the nation, from domestic terrorists inside the nation -- or from the current president? The tone of the program was clearly hostile to President Donald J. Trump. GOP Senator Jeff Flake, an anti-Trumper , for example, , interviewed by Todd, suggested that impeachment of the president could still be a possibility And on ABC's "This Week," May 27, moderator Martha Raddatz, encouraged Rep. Adam Schiff, a leading anti-Trump congressional figure,to suggest that all we needed for impeachment was an election, this November, that would give Democrats a House majority. Asking about the disclosures that the FBI installed an individual to keep an eye on the Trump campaign, Raddatz said that she disliked using the term "spy." Why? What do we call someone sent to a campaign from the outside to keep tabs on things? A secret volunteer? Republican Senator Marco Rubio, appearing on the ABC program, softly seemed to agree that the FBI involvement in the Trump campaign was understandable in a counter-terrorist context. Wasn't Rubio long hostile to Trump, indeed originating the comment about hand size. Those who point to Special Counsel Robert Mueller as a Republican -- signaling no political intent , ignore the political biases of Republicans like Sen. Flake and Sen. Bob Corker against Mr. Trump.

On Sunday tv political talk shows, then, the war against the presence of President Trump continues. The programs blare out anti-Trump sentiment, and so, suggest an existential treat to the media itself. The threat, that is, that the media is becoming increasingly irrelevant to the concerns and mood of the people at large. If impeachment, based on the fact of an election, is all the left has, doesn't that make the daily focus of the people irrelevant?

Meanwhile, the president continues to defend himself when attacked.

The New York Times, May 31 front-paged reaction from the president to the cancellation of the Roseanne Barr tv program for her nasty comments about Valerie Jarrett. The president tweeted that he was never got an apology from ABC for anti-Trump remarks made by ABC figures. The story led that it was the absence of apologies for attacks on the president that made him angry, not Barr's comment about the former top staffer for President Obama. Perhaps, however, Mr. Trump was simply continuing his habit of defending himself when attacked, a trait that according to an old French saying, would make him dangerous -- to his critics.

That the president may have a sense of humor unappreciated by his critics was evident from the time he suggested, on the matter of the missing 33,000 emails from Hillary Clinton's server, that perhaps the Russians can find them. Indeed that was, as LPR recalls, the basis from the campaign alleging collusion between the Russians and President Trump. Nearly two years later, this unverified allegation continues to lead the anti-Trump campaign. Recently, President Trump, the Tweeting President, suggested that the Democrats plan to use Russian collusion as a campaign theme, this November, which, he wryly indicated, would amount to meddling in the political process, itself. After the November elections, then a second special counsel, to probe Democrat collusion to rig the election via the cabal of the Big Three -- former CIA chief John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper and former FBI director James Comey.

Please take the LPR poll …
… found on the right-hand column on this page

Red Line

Would Trump Have Been Indicted Had He Lost?

June 5, 2018 --

May 20, Michael Goodwin in his New York Post column, aptly noted that had the election gone the other way, we would not have rejected the Iran deal, nor a U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, to name two major issues. On the matter of the special counsel office, though, things might have gone the same way -- not, of course, to probe President H. Clinton emails, but to probe those allegations of collusion between Trump and Russia.

LPR recalls the Times editorial that indicated the "toxic effects" of the Trump campaign will have to be addressed -- after a Clinton victory.

LPR imagines a campaign led by The New York Times, as it led the campaign for a special counsel, last May, to put Trump on trial for conniving with the Russians to become president. Note that had Hillary Clinton won, her IRS would have had the Trump tax returns to review --and/or leak to The Washington Post et al.

Red Line



Happy June 14 (Flag Day)

Happy Fourth of July

"A vote that represents free will is never wasted"
-- David Zukerman

Red Line

LPR Wonders...

June 12, 2018 --

LPR wonders if June 12, 2018 will go down in history as the day North Korea agreed to begin to phase out its nuclear weapons program and, Washington, as the day the Department of Justice finally decided to cooperation with Congress in turning over documents on Spygate and Dossiergate, pressured in part by the Inspector General's report on... Comeygate.

This website is updated regularly and previous articles are stored for reference. You are invited to read any of these past articles under the Archives section, by clicking on the "ARCHIVES" button on the right. (Editor's Note:  If you don't find the LPR article you are looking for in Archives by title, try searching in Observations.) If you would like to see enlargements of any of the photographs used on this website, please click on each photo. We thank you for visiting the Lonely Pamphleteer Review, and hope you come back again!

Support cooperative
free enterprise.

Predatory free enterprise
is bad for our
economic health.


If we don't speak out against economic bullying by Oil, Credit Cards, Municipalities, WHO WILL?

The Next Issue of LPR
will be online soon

Check out the following links -

Jackson Simon Review
Manhattan Short Film Festival

Veltis Harrattan

Christmas Village, Torrington, CT.

6/6/2018 -- LPR invites you to participate in our latest poll. We would like your opinion on the following:
1) The president, not the special counsel, is chief executive of the U.S., and so heads all federal departments, including the Department of Justice. The president should therefore, order the attorney general to direct, immediately, the publication of all relevant documents pertaining to the special counsel investigation. After all, don't the American people have the right to know?

(By the way, LPR is not aware that the American people have been informed as to the purpose of the CIA facility in Benghazi, Libya, attacked the night of September 11/12/2012, killing four Americans, including the ambassador to Libya.) Will the retiring Rep.Trey Gowdy disclose what was going on in a book about his investigation into the Benghazi matter?)
Show Results

LPR invites business faculty and media to join our regular clicksters for its view of the economy, among other places, as witnessed deep in the grass roots, and its advocacy of the principles of Federalist Paper No. 57, including the caution that the common good is not served when the self-serving few seek great economic sacrifices from the many.

Do you like this website and want to share it with a friend?

Want to know about the latest LPR updates and happenings? Then sign up for our mailing list today!

710168 Readers Throughout The World!

© 2018 Lonely Pamphleteer Review

LPR's Website is
In Memory Of …

Shana Zukerman
1989 - 2006